History of Wireless Technologies


Wireless technology’s development owes it all to Michael Faraday – for finding the principle of electromagnetic induction, to James Maxwell – to Guglielmo Marconi and for the Maxwell’s equations – for broadcasting a wireless signal over one and a half miles. The only intent of WiFi technology is wireless communication, through which information may be transferred between a couple of points that electric conductors do not connect.

Wireless technologies were in use since the arrival of radios. Finally, consumer electronics makers began considering the options of automating national microcontroller established devices. Trustworthy and timely relay of control commands and detector data were shortly reached, which resulted in the discovery of Wireless communications that we see everywhere.


With the radios being used for wireless communications on earth war era, inventors and scientists began focusing on means to developing wireless telephones. The radio shortly became accessible by mid 1980s and for consumers, mobile phones or wireless telephones began to appear. In the late 1990s, mobile phones got visibility that was enormous with over 50 million users world-wide. Subsequently the idea of wireless web and its possibilities were taken into consideration. The wireless web technology came into existence. This gave a boost to the advancement of wireless technology, which comes in several types at the moment.

Uses of Wireless Technology

Wireless technology’s fast advancement resulted in the creation of mobile phones that uses radio waves to empower communication from distinct places. The use of wireless technology ranges from wireless data communications in a variety of disciplines including wireless interface of computer peripherals, military, etc. to wireless energy transfers and medicine. Point to point, point to multipoint, airing, etc. are simple and potential now with using wireless.

Technology Acceptance Model


The way that people meet and communicate are altering. Individuals can meet, discuss, and work outside conventional assembly and office spaces collectively. For example, together with the addition of software made to help individuals ease selection and schedule meetings or learning procedures, is weakening geographic constraints and shifting social communication dynamics. Information technology is also drastically changing how that people study and teach.

As new information technologies infiltrate house, workplaces, and classrooms, research on user acceptance of new technologies has begun to get much attention from professionals along with academic researchers. Software sectors and programmers are starting to understand that dearth of user acceptance of technology can result in loss of resources and cash.
In analyzing usage and user approval of technology, the TAM is among the very mentioned models. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was designed by Davis to describe computer-use behavior. The theoretical foundation of the model was Fishbein and Ajzen’s Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA).

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is an information systems (System comprising the system of all communication channels used in a organization) theory that models how users come to tolerate and make use of a technology, The model indicates that when users are presented with a brand new software package, several variables affect their choice about how and when they’ll use it, notably:

Perceived usefulness (PU) – This was defined by Fred Davis as “the amount to which someone believes that using a specific system would enhance their job performance”.

Perceived ease-of-use (PEOU) Davis defined this as “the amount to which someone considers that using a specific system would be free from effort” (Davis, 1989).

The purpose of TAM is “to offer an explanation of the determinants of computer approval that’s general, capable of describing user behaviour across a wide array of end user computing technologies and user inhabitants, while at the exact same time being both parsimonious and theoretically justified”.